QUESTON NUMBER ONE:
Did the Eleventh Circuit abused its discretion by the affirmance of
Petitioner's 240-month federal sentence when the district court failed
to announce that it would have imposed the same sentence as an
alternative variant sentence in light of all the 3553 factors; failed
calculate the alternative Guideline range; and failed to properly justify
the chosen alternative sentence, thus, did render his two hundred-and-
forty-month federal sentence "substantively and procedurally
unreasonable" in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling in Gall v.
United States, 552 U.S. 38, 46 (2007) ?

Did the Eleventh Circuit abused its discretion by the affirmance of Petitioner's 240-month federal sentence