No. 23-7425
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: compulsory-process conflict-of-interest criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Was counsel ineffective in not using compulsory process for obtaining witnesses, identified by the United States Park Police and the AUSA in the movant's favor?
2) was movant's trial counsel ineffective in appointing his wife to represent him on appeal ignoring conflict free duties?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was counsel ineffective in not using compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in the movant's favor?
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 7, 2024)
Attorneys
Orlando Bell
Orlando Bell — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent