No. 23-7414
Mark A. VandenBoom v. Robert Strohmeyer
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts appellate-review circuit-court-jurisdiction civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-precedent precedent pro-se pro-se-litigation
Latest Conference:
2024-06-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals judgement conflict with this court's precedents resulting in a limitation of access to the court due to the petitioner's pro se status?
Did the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals judgement continue to allow Indiana state courts to systematically deny a citizen of their right to due process?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals judgement conflict with this court's precedents resulting in a limitation of access to the court due to the petitioner's pro se status?
Docket Entries
2024-08-19
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-07-25
DISTRIBUTED.
2024-07-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Strohmeyer to respond filed.
2024-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 7, 2024)
Attorneys
Mark A. VandenBoom
Mark A. VandenBoom — Petitioner
Robert Strohmeyer
James Allen Barta — Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent