No. 23-741
Iftikar A. Ahmed v. Securities and Exchange Commission, et al.
Tags: appellate-procedure circuit-split civil-procedure cross-appeal-rule greenlaw-v-united-states judicial-discretion jurisdiction remand remedy-limitation substantive-law
Latest Conference:
2024-06-13
Related Cases:
23-987
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the cross-appeal rule, which prohibits the granting of a remedy in favor of an appellee absent the filing of a cross-appeal, is jurisdictional or otherwise mandatory, or whether it admits of any exception, including, inter alia, for remands or changes in substantive law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the cross-appeal rule is jurisdictional or mandatory, or admits of exceptions
Docket Entries
2024-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-04-26
Reply of petitioner Iftikar Ahmed filed.
2024-04-10
Brief of respondents Securities and Exchange Commission, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-02-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 10, 2024.
2024-02-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 11, 2024 to April 10, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-02-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 11, 2024.
2024-02-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2024 to March 11, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Iftikar Ahmed
Vincent Gregory Levy — Holwell Shuster & Goldberg, LLP, Petitioner
SEC, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent