IS IT THE AUTHORITY OF THE SUPERIOR COURT TO HEAR/SEIZE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF A DEFENDANT?

IS THE FOUNDATION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT LEGITIMATE IN ALLOWING A DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY TO MANIPULATE, VERBAL UNFORTUNATE, AND MISERY A CLIENT INTO PLEADING TO BE OF MERIT PUBLIC?

IS IT APPROPRIATE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT TO IGNORE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?

IS REASON AND SOUND JUDGMENT THE ASCRIBE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT.

IF SO, WHAT REASON, AND WHAT SOUND JUDGMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT MASTERFUL TO THE UNCONSEQUENTIAL IN THIS MATTER?

Whether the superior court has the authority to debase the constitutional rights of a defendant