No. 23-7383
Kenric Ledbetter, et al. v. Religious Practice Committee, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process filing-fees legal-document petition prison-litigation-reform-act standing supreme-court writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
0\-cU_<- 4 W GtV ^<K C Xk Gt-S l. C>jWeA^^ -VWe. US /A^)|0€ c.'s
a.pp-eoA ^tv>~v\ cv ■?'0
Co r> Si oV«-< " ol^\
<X /V\.«a Wf — p Veti/v^ i l°\^3 -S'>-*.'"f- pXcti V
CX por - pV.CL\A^ I $ ?0^ ^W«- lC9 pnSo
/W.»as4\Tw\ A C_4
ex fW.O 14- i ~ p ^ Q- . A t' Tfa.\ f'Q. XCX4k«. Prison Li'K^OL-VioAoO W«^4V\«.^"
pC 'T l°VH2 S-C+ ?Ol .
\ i i a&.a4 U-Xv or- p<2--c— caS 12-3
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires per-plaintiff filing fees in a multi-plaintiff lawsuit
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-03-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2024)
Attorneys
Kenric Ledbetter, et al.
Kenric Ledbetter — Petitioner