Is the "United States " a medium employed by the United States of America assigned for the upholding of the United States Constitution to the best of it's abilities through people who swore oaths and if so who or what is the United States' replacement when/if the United States is deemed uncapable of completing the assignment of upholding the United States Constitution because of the syndicated and repeated willful incompetence of people acting under color of law across powerful positions of the United States Government, people of which who are complicit with allowing violations of the United States Constitution, United States Code, and monopoly law such as THE SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT, and if not, who upholds the United States Constitution when people acting under color of law who are supposed to be representing powerful positions of the United States Government knowingly don 't reinforce the United States Constitution or knowingly allow others to do the same?

Why should it be okay to the most powerful, significant, and relevant courts of all the land within the United States of America after all known remedies of executive branches have been exhausted, to allow things of Document 1-2 of Docket # 24-1122 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and things of attached Appendix A such as that of pages A57-A82, things which include allowing people to lie maliciously about a non-celebrity(seeable at attached Appendix A pages A64-A66, A71-A77, and A94-A97) and pass it olf as genuine news that he had narcotics and a felony conviction and had gone to the pen but was only given a misdemeanor firearm charge and that he pulled a KNIFE on a female BARTENDER and that he had explosives in his car essentially touting to civilian populations of the world that people should see him jailed or murdered because he illegally or dishonestly overstepped the executive branch like a terrorist who killed a member of the United States Armed Forces by supplying explosives to terrorists who use them in the Middle East and doesn 't get busted for narcotics or guns because he's a snitch, rat, narc, undercover cop woman-beating terrorist who is a threat to Armed Forces across the globe as lies were seen in different countries overseas, ignore homosexual monopolies such as the one Plaintiff pointed out regarding the multi-billion dollar industry of search engines that bring up LGBTQ, gay topics, gay rainbows, and same sex marriage topics as top search results when the word "heterosexual" is typed in seemingly intentionally diluting colored people 's rights and women 's rights(Appendix pages A71 and A78), let the incompetence of police be okay regarding a 911 call(and other reports) about things including sexual assault in victim 's sleep(Appendix A pages A70 and A78), and let the Plaintiff in separate instances be beaten, shot at, chased by a knife weilding assailant, and kicked in the head by a steel toed boot(Appendix A pages A63, A70, A78, and A86-A93), while Plaintiff was (and still is) without a mere offer of anything from any one regarding malicious lies such as no offers from the State of Idaho (or any agencies within)/ media companies/United States (and agencies within) after they were shown significant evidence that proves lies were fabricated about the Plaintiff, while at the same time the Plaintiff is the one who pointed out and still is pointing out a monopoly of a multi-billion dollar industry and wants credit for that?

Is the 'United States' a medium employed by the United States of America assigned for the upholding of the United States Constitution