No. 23-7371
Laron Darrell Carter v. United States
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure court-of-appeals district-court jurisdiction jurisdictional-issue mandate mandate-rule procedural-law waiver
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the rule requiring a district court to follow the mandate of a court of appeals is "jurisdictional" such that it cannot be waived by a party.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the rule requiring a district court to follow the mandate of a court of appeals is jurisdictional
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-12
Reply of Laron Carter submitted.
2024-08-12
Reply of petitioner Laron Carter filed.
2024-08-02
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-06-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 2, 2024.
2024-06-24
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-06-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 3, 2024 to August 2, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-06-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 3, 2024.
2024-05-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 3, 2024 to July 3, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-04-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2024)
Attorneys
Laron Carter
Benjamin Lee Coleman — Benjamin L. Coleman Law PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent