This case present's important and lonstanding issues of both "FIRST STEP ACT" law and Fifth Amendment law.

QUESTION 1) Does "DECLINING TO REVIEW" the merits of a 404(b) petition violate the "Complete Review" Provision of 404(c)?

QUESTION 2) Can a district court "DECLINE TO REVIEW" or "OPT AGAINST ADDRESSING A PETITIONER'S CLAIMS" in a 404(b) motion without violating the defendants "Fifth Amendment Right" to Due Process of law?

QUESTION 3) Can a district court deny a 404(b) motion Pursuant to the "CONCURRENT SENTENCING DOCTRINE" and NOT violate the "COMPLETE REVIEW" Provision of 404(c)?

QUESTION 4) Can a district court rule contradictive to Congress intent and add a(n) additional Limitation to a Statue?

Does declining to review the merits of a 404(b) petition violate the complete-review provision of 404(c)?