I. Whether this Court should resolve the split in the Third Circuit and Fourth Circuit concerning whether a claimant may appeal an order denying recusal of a judge prior to a final determination on the merits to overturn the decisions as egreg iously violating Due process as partial with reward to Judge P hipp's in terms of a potential US Supreme Court seat Presidential nominee Trump by reciprocating punishment to discipline but for the fact I sued Trump , in light of the dissent brilliantly distinguishing Supreme Court case Order on this issue at Martin v Knox , 112 S.Ct. 620 and the irreparable injury to me in terms of the Court disbarring me by ent rapment for retiring f rom PA in 20 18 which is not legal cause to disbar me in a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding where the original court placed my license on inactive disabled but for the exercise of the right to petition to dissolve the establishment of government religion by former President Trump, continued by President Biden as creating a substantial burden upo n my religious exercise of beliefs and i mpending continu ing government persecution in light of DE 's latest attack against m e in March 2024 .

II. Whether the court deprived me of the 5th Amendment right to a fair proceeding or violated 28 U.S. Code §§ 144 and 455, 29 CFR § 2200.68, or other applicable law by failing to recuse Judge Phipps given the original disciplinary petitions and this reciprocal petition are based on my petitions against Trump, Trump twice placed Phipp's on a list of nominees for US Supreme Court, and Trump will likely nominate Phipps' as Supreme Court justice should he be reelected and an opening occur considering the facts unde r objective standards, the probability of actual bias on the part of the Judge Phipps against me and in favor of Trump and my opponents is too high to be constitutionally tolerable.

III. Whether this proceeding violates Due Process and U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 3 causing manifest injustice against me in terms of capricious loss of liberties, threat to life and eternal life under the facts : there is no adver se party other than the partial presiding court , or case and controversy ; no injury fairly traceable to any prospective relief other than hypothetical and speculated theorized conjectural injury in a case con ducting in a partial unfair forum where Judge Diamond booby trapped me as applied knowing I risk death i n that he had notice I collapsed from dehydration, had health limitations which DE and PA ignored in my assertions of ADA due to bad healthcare , with religious objections to healthcare and examinations , was concerned because people threatened me with bodily injury and death, throwing stuff at my car, talking about sho oting me actually shoot ing two bullets in a friend 's house but for exercise of Const li berties, notice of the murder of my cousin, and that I had no means to resear ch his entrap ping question as to w hy my 2018 retirement in PA would not re tire my license in his court by the draconian order of disbarring me while exhibiting other evidence of bad faith elimination of liberties for what I believe is the mark of lawlessness written about in the Bible called the mark of the beast or sin by sacrificing human life, liberty or health for mammon, including but not li mited to material gain , productivity, convenience, avoidance of costs and profit.

IV. Whether the court deprived me of the 5th Amendment right to a fair proceeding or violated 28 U.

Whether a claimant may appeal an order denying recusal of a judge prior to a final determination on the merits