I. The United States Supreme Court has held that a state criminal Appellant has Constitutional Right to a fair trial guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Evidence Was Inconsistent With Appellant Claim Of Self Defense
Evidence Was Insufficient To Prove Premeditated Murder

II. Whether a Appellant who is serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole is denied his constitutional rights to counsel where counsel's representation fell outside that range of reasonably professional assistance for:
Misadvising Appellant Not To Testify Violating Appellant 's 5th 6th And 14th Amendment Right 's Under Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel And The United States Constitution, And Article 1, Section 12, Of The Florida Constitution
For Not Objecting To The Jury Instruction That Was Erroneous And Essentially Vitiated Appellant 's Claim Of Self-Defense Violating Appellant 's 5th 6th And 14th Amendment Right 's Under Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel And The United States Constitution, And Article 1, Section 12, Of The Florida Constitution.
Trial Counsel Was Ineffective For Abandoning Stand Your Ground Motion Violating Appellant 's 5th 6th And 14th Amendment Right 's Under Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel And The United States Constitution, And Article 1, Section 12, Of The Florida Constitution.
The Cumulative Impact of Trial Counsel 's Multiple Errors Deprived Appellant of a Fair Trial in Violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution

Whether it's proper to deny a claim without holding an evidentiary when the record clearly does not refute the claim?

whether-a-state-criminal-appellant-has-constitutional-right-to-fair-trial