Marvin Holmes v. Mark Miller, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
1. Did the Court of Appeals violate Appellant's Constitutional right to Due Process by not
issuing a Certificate of Appealability?
2. Did the District Court violate Appellant's Constitutional right to Due Process by failing
to grant a hearing for reconsideration or rehearing en banc?
3. Was the District Court decision to adopt the Report & Recommendation contrary to
well settled Federal Law that violated Appellant's Constitutional right to Due Process?
4. Was the District Court confronted with substantial Constitutional violations in
Appellant's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and;
5. If so, did the District Court violate Appellant's right to Due Process by finding that
there were no substantial Constitutional Claims made therein?
Did the Court of Appeals violate Appellant's Constitutional right to Due Process by not issuing a Certificate of Appealability?