No. 23-7306
Ronnie Y. Conrad v. Rob St. Andre, Warden
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment conflict-of-interest criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel presumption-of-prejudice prosecutorial-misconduct retroactivity sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the presumption of prejudice applies to conflict-of-counsel claims when the defense attorney is being prosecuted by the same agency prosecuting his client? If so, is that clearly established by this Court's case law?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the presumption of prejudice applies to conflict-of-counsel claims when the defense attorney is being prosecuted by the same agency prosecuting his client?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-04-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 28, 2024)
Attorneys
Ronnie Conrad
Dale Francis Ogden Jr. — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
St. Andre, Warden
Kenneth Charles Byrne — California Attorney General, Respondent