Did the U.S. District Court violate petitioners XIV Amendment right to due process, equal protection of the law and 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing after acknowledging the petitioner did not receive a full and fair hearing in state court?

Is the standard for 'evidence significant to proceed' equal to the XIV Amendment guarantee 'evidence beyond a reasonable doubt' as the U.S.District court ruled it was?

Was petitioner denied his XIV Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel (by counsel's own omission) for . a) failing to investigate, b) failing to consult with an independent medical expert?

Can focusing on one part of an answer distort the content and meaning of the overall statement?

Did the U.S. District Court violate petitioners XIV Amendment right to due-process, equal-protection, 28-usc-2254d