No. 23-730
Anna Pezhman v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: arbitration arbitration-law civil-rights civil-rights-act-1964 equitable-doctrine federal-preemption impartiality impartiality-doctrine judicial-intervention quota-system title-vii
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does Federal Law pre-empt New York 's mandatory equitable doctrine of seeking court intervention in mid-arbitration proceedings to remedy arbitral impartiality?
2. What is evident partiality?
3. Is the implementation of a mandatory quota system vis-a-vis hiring Blacks, in response solely to the Black Lives Movement demonstrations, violative of the Civil Rights Act 1964, Title VII?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does federal law preempt New York's mandatory equitable doctrine of seeking court intervention in mid-arbitration proceedings to remedy arbitral impartiality?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Bloomingdales, Inc to respond filed.
2024-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 5, 2024)
Attorneys
Anna Pezhman
Anna Pezhman — Petitioner
Bloomingdales, Inc
Michael Corey Christman — Macy's Law Department, Respondent