No. 23-7298 — Supreme Court Petition Tracker

No. 23-7298

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit

Docketed: 2024-04-24

Status: Denied

Type: IFP

Response WaivedIFP

Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-trial due-process eyewitness-identification hobbs-act-robbery jury-instruction jury-instructions suggestive-identification suggestive-procedure third-circuit

Key Terms:
DueProcess

Latest Conference: 2024-05-23

Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether petitioner's jury was adequately "warn[ed] to take care in appraising identification evidence," in accordance with due process, where his jury was not instructed that a suggestive identification procedure may undermine an eyewitness identification. See Perry v. New Hampshire, 565 U.S. 228, 245-46 (2012).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner's jury was adequately 'warn[ed] to take care in appraising identification evidence,' in accordance with due process, where his jury was not instructed that a suggestive identification procedure may undermine an eyewitness identification