No. 23-729

Roee Kiviti, et ux. v. Naveen Prasad Bhatt

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: article-iii article-three-courts bankruptcy-courts bankruptcy-jurisdiction case-or-controversy civil-procedure constitutional-law judicial-review mootness mootness-doctrine standing
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether bankruptcy courts are bound by the case-or-controversy requirement of Article III of the Constitution.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether bankruptcy courts are bound by the case-or-controversy requirement of Article III of the Constitution

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-18
Reply of petitioners Roee Kiviti, et ux. filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2024-04-05
Brief of respondent Naveen Bhatt in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2024-02-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 5, 2024.
2024-02-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2024 to April 5, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-02-05
Response Requested. (Due March 6, 2024)
2024-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-05
Waiver of right of respondent Naveen Bhatt to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-01-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 5, 2024)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Naveen Bhatt
Justin Philip Fasano — McNamee Hosea, P.A., Respondent
Roee Kiviti, et al.
Maurice Belmont VerStandig — The VerStandig Law Firm. LLC, Petitioner