it4 V- VOMisiAHfv / THIS Covet \i$u> that The 6|/th Amendment to the
Vt^TEp STATED C^H6rVrroT\cn , 6/TENDEP To THE STATED £>y wAy OpTUe FoOpTeENTH
ANl^DMEh'T , peSHM^ep THAT A VJNWjMCV'S JUpy p(NP a DEfGHDANT £VMtfv
Op A EEf-lovS OffFN^E IN U)U!MA nA- f&MoS V- WoV|^ anA; viS.. —7 1405-CT-Fb^jO
T0((? U-6D.it) (TolcQ , TRI|S /NCIVDED CAS^ THAT W6|ze pGNDIN^ <JN P1IZ6CT P€view
V/H6N FAWOS X- U>VJIS\ANA WM PCClPED. $pifpl1W V. KeMVClCf , 4*14 U-iSH 3L3.
|(JT S-CT-To6 ("Hfa ( <T3 U- 6D.7P (/H (<*)3~0. EVIDENCE Cf A jvipy fccWNT eXisrs-mjai*#
A <6M€ST jON Pt^oM TitTfHNU J>VJPG<E T^TMEJ'^p/ 6°NF»pMlN& THAT ATL^AST to _>jZoj2£
A&PEEP ToTHEvEpDicT /kfJ ANSwEp Pp?M THE jopy r<Z£SpjJblN6?
\{££. THe cofT AppEAU ) poupr cl poj*T ftCpviow U= P &Efc^ THAT THE- 6WE£T|C*)
rrvj peHAiNgP o»jpesoo<ep \amtu HTTU\is»e\ pepiNmvepj saving wHrrvtep,
Ti\£ v<TtS wepe io-z / u~i rz-'-o e«t held that THe. j*jpy vepicK
wepp IT-C? No>J0tE THE . TUe «9.0€ETlOK/pp-p^etsfTEio THEE£ Qp<XMST?\NCES
\NA6Ti4Gp {V CokiViETl(^o C'AnJ be Oj^TAlN&D^ |M U^HT cp THl£ Cxs^<, hou?|K&
iN fcfcHOSV. LOUl£t AHA TV\At the AweNPMEKiT gE&Olfe; p VNAUlMcy^
-)vJ|[2AJ Co^N\C~f f WHEN THE j££dOp£> P^es V)0T f\fp lpMPcT\\|

Whether a conviction can be obtained, in light of Ramos v. Louisiana holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a unanimous jury to convict, when the record does not affirmatively indicate that the jury was unanimous, evidence of a jury count exists, and no polling was conducted