No. 23-7225
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment commerce-clause constitutional-interpretation due-process federal-authority federal-statute firearm-regulation firearms interstate-commerce second-amendment standing
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment framework of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
II.
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) should be construed to require a more substantial connection to interstate commerce than the mere passage of a firearm across state lines in an unspecified way, and if not, whether it exceeds Congress's power to enact?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment framework of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen
Docket Entries
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Leroy Hoyle
Stephanie Eileen Inman — The Law Office of Stephanie Inman, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent