No. 23-7205
Tags: administrative-deference circuit-split fraud fraud-loss intended-loss kisor-v-wilkie loss-calculation sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Commentary to the Fraud Loss Table U.S.S.G. §2B1.1(b), Note 3(A) Defining Loss as Including "Intended Loss," Should Be Given Deference After Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S.Ct. 2400, 2415 (2019).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Commentary to the Fraud Loss Table U.S.S.G. §2B1.1(b), Note 3(A) Defining Loss as Including 'Intended Loss,' Should Be Given Deference After Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S.Ct. 2400, 2415 (2019)
Docket Entries
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2024)
Attorneys
Luke Joselin
Margaret Yvonne Foldes — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent