No. 23-7191

Jay Lin v. Aaron Sayers

Lower Court: New Jersey
Docketed: 2024-04-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process forgery judicial-misconduct new-jersey-courts perjury perjury-allegation secret-law secretive-stipulation trial-procedure
Latest Conference: 2024-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

New Jersey State Courts allow the practice a secret law of "Secretive Stipulation'' to bind and against the underprivileged New Jersey citizen, a suspect of violation of the Due Process law of the United State Constitution.

The questions presented are:

1. The Court should outlaw the New Jersey State Courts practices of allowing the New Jersey trial court holding "Secretive Stipulation" with Defense attorney.

2. The New Jersey Courts erred in conducting an unlawful trial in this case, a violation of the Due Process law of the United States Constitutions.

A. The New Jersey Courts allow the trial court ignored and attempted to shield Defendant's attorney's criminal acts of Perjury and Forgery.

B. The New Jersey Trial Court entered Judgment without any testimonies, witnesses, experts, records, reasons, arguments, facts, rules or laws but private, personal, secretive stipulation from the defense attorney from the trial.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Due-process-violation

Docket Entries

2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-04-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2024)

Attorneys

Jay Lin
Jay J. Lin — Petitioner