No. 23-7158
Russell Dean Alford v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-law due-process first-amendment free-speech overbreadth political-expression protected-speech secret-service statutory-interpretation vagueness
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
In § 1752(a)(2)'s and § 5104(e)(2)(D)'s prohibitions against "disorderly or disruptive" conduct, do "disorderly" and "disruptive" narrow the types of conduct criminalized, or do those adjectives refer only to conduct's effect under the circumstances, so that even mere presence may violate the statutes?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 'disorderly' and 'disruptive' in 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2) and 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D) narrow the types of conduct criminalized, or refer only to the conduct's effect under the circumstances
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-08
Reply of Russell Dean Alford submitted.
2024-07-08
Reply of petitioner Russell Dean Alford filed. (Distributed)
2024-06-24
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2024-06-24
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-05-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 24, 2024.
2024-05-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 23, 2024 to June 24, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-04-23
Response Requested. (Due May 23, 2024)
2024-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-04-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Russell Dean Alford
James Tobia Gibson — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent