WHETHER Florida's suspension OF THE PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS VIOLATES ARTICLE 1, SECTION 9 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?

WHETHER Florida's suspension of THE PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, NOT IN CASES OF REBELLION OR INVASION IN THE INTEREST OF STATE ENFORCEMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, A GREAT PUBLIC INTEREST?

WHETHER FLORIDA'S SUSPENSION OF THE PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS NOT IN CASES OF REBELLION OR INVASION, BUT IN CASE LAWS, ADOPTED TO ABRIDGE THAT PRIVILEGE, A VIOLATION OF AMENDMENT FOURTEEN, SECTION ONE TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION THAT EXPLICITLY PROHIBITS SUCH LAWS?

WHETHER Florida's presuming speech trial violation claims raised in a PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO HAVE BEEN WAIVED BY INACTION TO RAISE THE CLAIM ON DIRECT APPEAL A WAIVER FORBIDDEN BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?

WHETHER FLORIDA'S SUSPENSION OF THE PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FROM PETITIONERS SEEKING REMEDY FOR ILLEGAL IMPRISONMENT FROM CONSTITUTIONAL SPEEDY TRIAL VIOLATIONS DENYING EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS ENACTED AND ADOPTED TO ENFORCE THE RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL, IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW CLAUSE OF AMENDMENT 14, SECTION 1, TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?

IF ANY OF THE ABOVE QUESTIONS ARE ANSWERED YES, SHOULD THIS SUPREME COURT ORDER FLORIDA TO GRANT THE WRIT EXHIBIT A DEALS TO DO?

Whether Florida's suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus violates Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution