No. 23-7141
Keith Martin Molineaux v. Donnie Ames, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253 brady-material certificate-of-appealability confession-fabrication false-confession habeas-corpus miller-el-standard miller-el-v-cockrell
Latest Conference:
2024-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Under Miller-El v. Cockrell 537 U.S. 322 (2003), should the Petitioner's novel claim that his confession was fabricated be encouraged to proceed further, thus necessitating a Certificate of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253?
Under Miller-El v. Cockrell 537 U.S. 322 (2003), should the Petitioner's claim that the State withheld Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83 (1963) material be encouraged to proceed further, thus necessitating a Certificate of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the petitioner's novel claim that his confession was fabricated be encouraged to proceed further, necessitating a Certificate of Appealability?
Docket Entries
2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-08
Waiver of right of respondent Donnie Ames, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex to respond filed.
2024-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2024)
Attorneys
Donnie Ames, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Keith M. Molineaux
Keith Molineaux — Petitioner