No. 23-7118

Danilo Augusto Feliciano, aka Danil Ezekiel Faust v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2024-04-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-discretion arbitrary-and-capricious civil-procedure constitutional-analysis due-process judicial-review legal-interpretation precedent-setting statutory-construction
Latest Conference: 2024-05-23
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can an agency decision not to enforce a law despite notification of a longstanding, persistent violation of the law that has been publicly admitted to, be deemed as 'arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not in accordance with law' under 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A)?

Docket Entries

2024-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent Garland, Merrick B. to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Danilo A. Feliciano
Danilo A. Feliciano — Petitioner
Garland, Merrick B.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent