No. 23-7114

Richard Marschall v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: drug-mislabeling due-process felony fifth-amendment food-and-drug-administration mens-rea recidivist recidivist-enhancement strict-liability
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment mandates a mens rea term for the felony recidivist enhancement, 21 U.S.C. § 333(a)(2), of the misdemeanor drug mislabeling offense described by 21 U.S.C. § 331(a)?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment mandates a mens rea term for the felony recidivist enhancement, 21 U.S.C. § 333(a)(2), of the misdemeanor drug mislabeling offense described by 21 U.S.C. § 331(a)

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-03-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2024)

Attorneys

Richard Marschall
Gregory Scott GeistFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent