No. 23-7107
Brock Melancon v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing deference judicial-deference kisor-v-wilkie sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation u.s.-sentencing-commission
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Securities
AdministrativeLaw Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Does this Court's decision in Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (2019), govern the extent to which district courts may defer to the U.S. Sentencing Commission's commentary to the Guidelines Manual in calculating a criminal defendant's sentencing range?
(2) Is Application Note 1 to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 in the 2018 Guidelines Manual invalid under the Kisor framework?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does this Court's decision in Kisor v. Wilkie govern the extent to which district courts may defer to the U.S. Sentencing Commission's commentary to the Guidelines Manual in calculating a criminal defendant's sentencing range?
Docket Entries
2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-03-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2024)
Attorneys
Brock Melancon
Samantha Jean Kuhn — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent