No. 23-7105
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: closing-arguments criminal-procedure due-process home-incarceration jail-credit jury-instructions presumption-of-innocence prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. THE PROSECUTOR ENGAGED IN FLAGARANT MISCONDUCT
WHEN HE TOLD THE JURY IN CLOSING "THAT THE
PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE. . .IS GONE "
II. DID TRIAL COURT ERR IN NOT GRANTING JAIL CREDIT,
SPECIFICALLY HOME INCARCERATION, PURSUANT TO HOUSE
BILL 310 SIGNED INTO LAW ON APRIL 8, 2022?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the prosecutor's statement to the jury that the presumption of innocence is gone constitute flagrant misconduct?
Docket Entries
2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent Commonwealth of Kentucky to respond filed.
2024-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2024)
Attorneys
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Katherine Barrett
Katherine Barrett — Petitioner