vr XYove a. xx©ad asvveodUjd
a^^ou^! !po,(YoC- <\3&u-vc
Had (Aorvoexx .
aXcudAe odemyjU. fe&foIV ate),
Xv x uov3r\ -\o aw\£x\d a\2_ cY Ay\^ '
X ©u<^\gAI\j kded ( do
X Q5W'0<* -AVvs. employ v udd\
cdco^xa.1 YxovtdQi;
(LmiY?
do^-e-k) $A-e a. A^adaviY ©aq1
Pe^jute^V do CAx aAcde (\&Ydo_ c£- appeal
\xoftkd -k> <xmej\d ecm^3Uuv\A^Yv^YckY
Cd^X awiovt 4V^l cdVhp(£«id 4hfCuflj h
~YY\jl \k5. 3<A)Cd>AAx Qojl(VT

Whether the district court erred in denying the petitioner's motion to amend the complaint under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure