The first question is toward a Rules of Civil Procedure of Vermonts own
▼ r rt \T m W7-+ m /I h S' ittiI Iy i/iic ixcyviaixc vv xuuiiaiii uuuxi njivu jl/i v loiun uv<vw>A UU. U petitioner was prompte
provide a short plain statement to accompany claim, placed in the docket entry as a
Request for Amendment with the Claim which led to detraction of the entire case
despite placement for clarification, correction of Statute cited in complaint, and a
direct statement upon Motion to Reconsider to the Vermont Supreme Court.

I believe the matter was improperly denied joinder or consolidation upon
request with other cases to include matter 23-CV-02764 appealed from WindhamNewfane Civil Unit to the Vermont Supreme Court as 23-AP-392 citing common law
Negligence particularly to each matter in policing by Brattleboro Town Police
Department and for efficiency.

Tlib final question here is whether the complaint made to the Brattlebofo
Police Communication Committee actually did investigate the complaint. No
handwritten response, or much else is verified.

whether-vermont-civil-procedure-rules-were-properly-applied