Where jurors were instructed that they may only consider mitigating evidence to be evidence that "reduces the defendant's moral blameworthiness," and where the record reflects that jurors understood the term "moral blameworthiness" to be synonymous with "culpability," is there a reasonable likelihood that the jury applied the challenged instruction in a way that prevented consideration of constitutionally relevant mitigating evidence?

Whether the 'moral blameworthiness' jury instruction prevented the consideration of constitutionally relevant mitigating evidence