Ambrose C. Mendes v. Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Attorneys at Law, Inc.
a. Whether the Trial court held a duty to obey the State supreme court holdings that it follows a prior judge ruling unless consent of parties agree otherwise or the trial court makes a clear record why he is not following it—neither was offered, just that the trial judge was not affording trial by jury over an accounting claim.
b. Does a Probate Trial Judge have a duty, when mandating settlement of parties, to insure Pro se parties have a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent ability to understood all duties regarding a settlement?
c. Do Rhode Island Judges hold a ethical duty to hear all matters and adjudicate the facts, even if those facts could destroy a law firm 's business?
Whether the Trial court held a duty to obey the State supreme court holdings