No. 23-7068
Jabari J. Johnson v. Jill Brady, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review legal-counsel post-conviction right-to-counsel standing
Latest Conference:
2024-05-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state court erred in denying petitioner's request for a hearing on his 35C01 post-conviction claim
Docket Entries
2024-05-28
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 24, 2024)
Attorneys
Jabari Johnson
Jabari Johnson — Petitioner