No. 23-705
Stephen Robert Deck v. California
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-sanction custody custody-definition due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus in-custody liberty-interests liberty-restraint sex-offender-registration
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities Privacy
HabeasCorpus Securities Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether California's sex offender registration mandates under Calif. Penal Code section 290 place sufficiently significant burdens on a registrant's liberty so as to allow a federal habeas corpus petitioner standing to file a timely federal habeas petition under 22 U.S.C. 2254; that is, whether the registration burdens "significantly restrain petitioner's liberty to do those things which in this country free men are entitled to do[.]" Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236, 243 (1963).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether California's sex offender registration mandates place sufficiently significant burdens on a registrant's liberty to allow a federal habeas corpus petition
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-10
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2023-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 29, 2024)
Attorneys
California
Collette Catherine Cavalier — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Stephen Deck
Charles M Sevilla — Petitioner