No. 23-7047
Renaire Roshique Lewis, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: coconspirator-hearsay counsel criminal-procedure due-process evidence federal-rules-of-evidence fifth-amendment miranda-warnings right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
L. Whether the presence of counsel obviates the need for Miranda warnings; and
I. Whether Bourjaily v. United States permits the affirmance of the admission of coconspirator hearsay under F.R.E. 801(d)(2)(E) where no evidence indicates that the other party to the conversation was a coconspirator or that the conversation furthered the conspiracy?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the presence of counsel obviates the need for Miranda warnings
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2024)
Attorneys
Renaire Lewis, Jr.
William Robinson Heroy — Goodman Carr, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent