Whether a defendant's forging of a signature of a bank employee on a lien release, used as supporting documentation for a bank loan in the defendant's own name, is sufficiently central to the underlying offense to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, where the bank employee suffered no loss and where the primary offense involved the defendant providing inflated salary and employment information for herself.

Whether a defendant's forging of a signature of a bank employee on a lien release, used as supporting documentation for a bank loan in the defendant's own name, is sufficiently central to the underlying offense to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A