No. 23-7039
Everett Dale Webb v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Tags: appeals appellate-counsel constitutional-right constitutional-rights double-jeopardy due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-exhaustion procedural-default
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that Petitioner's
double jeopardy claim was unexhausted or procedurally defaulted?
2. Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that Petitioner's
ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim failed to make
a showing of denial of a constitutional right on. Petitioner's
double jeopardy claim?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that Petitioner's double-jeopardy claim was unexhausted or procedurally-defaulted
Docket Entries
2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 19, 2024)
Attorneys
Everett Dale Webb
Everett Dale Webb — Petitioner