No. 23-7032
Bryan Lee Gregory v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-144 28-usc-455 appellate-review civil-procedure due-process judicial-bias judicial-procedure petition-renaming recusal rule-60-b standing
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
1 ST QUESTION
WAS JUDGE STEVEN BOUGH ALLOW TO RENAME MR.GREGORY'S 28 USCS 144
PETITION AS A 28 USCS 455 PETITION?
2ND QUESTION
WAS MR.GREGORY DENIED HIS FUNDIMNETAL DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A FAIR
TRIAL IN HIS RULE 60-B, PURSUANT TO 28 USC 455 (b) (5) (iii) ?
3RD QUESTION
DID MR.GREGORY SUFFER BIAS IN HIS APPEAL OF HIS RULE 50-BBY APPEALLANT
JUDGE STRUS BEING ON THE JUDGE PANEL OF MR.GREGORYS APPEAL OF HIS
RULE 50 (b)?
4th QUESTION
WAS JUDGE STEVEN BOUGH REQUIRED TO ACCEPTS THE FACTS AS BEING TRUE
IN MR GREGORY 1s 28 USCS 144 PETITION THAT HE FILED IN HIS RULE_60
(b) PETITION ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was judge allowed to rename petition
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2024)
Attorneys
Bryan Lee Gregory
Bryan Lee Gregory — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent