>), \be p>wjo4a\ c^uesViOk , u^oeVoe^ %xe 3tote>' defied
&ppe\\ftd VixS ~T)ue ^V\2.oc£SS > Vv5bao iV p^£Sso\ed ^s\g
ao, rftxsYeftdi'o^ 4e^Vi*Y)0O{j bq %e 5Aft4e& uOi^OeSS fxftdl
u)\%out\ ft PevieuD oP Me Reoosact , >s uOV^eR. Ufte &ue
QouftV , ^sjsded? , cMsdooted od \cpQQQ$ Append Cl<iim oP
CeosMuoAwe. ~02.io\ft^ of &s^sWoc4 ;%Af pi^cdifl^i) /^pglU*4
)Jj 44ie proceed ocjs, uOlo^te Cv&kftQij 4o *>*jvolues ftO
'UtftfEASoNfllble AfpliMitO*) 0^ \Mj£>.

z). ^h^UfteR. 4V\d 6Vflfe Caufif deftft)ij efcRei it^ i\s AppUaiafe
QodCio\foc| fscle&d \ftiO, is uoV)4%te(2. Me Vfc^esV SMk. Could
CC/oudr cT (Lewibd of ~1exA3) 3V>ouH baste Cocci udf
^ ^Res/idvjO of Me 'Rec.oftd , 4o ft- obaistao
OppeUftM CMVis, v^n&toeo. ft fuodiacj of ao »oe£&fwe
A§Si§\$0C6 oo douwOSftJ Cluuift, >6 6uffic.t<s^ CAUSg %il ^AiUa
4o flf&se. <w ^ufttob ob)edtoo *V 4dftJ . due 4o ft %)\&A
ftud isJSufti(uoo4 x&to^Uo os/eaome sktoiccj pQ£Sum|^Wo
of douKJsei <\$M ^rMgqi/,M 'tWlulftfe .Me issues 4£)& Qjpeilfife
(Wd pwd Me oldies Ololiydriw Tj/odec. AaMJe o^.l^
(h)j(j\J ?)@M| v, U^lflAJdf, 3*73 U3, &3 67d%3J,

Whether the state court denied the petitioner due process by presenting a close or misleading testimony by the state's witness and without a review of the record