1. In the Interest of Public Safety and Public Trust should the Title V Exemption extended to the Federal Aviation Administration from the Office of Personnel Management be considered Unconstitutional since reports of Waste, Fraud, and Abuse are Extreme, Well Documented, and Severely Dangerous to the Flying Public, Workforce, and Society?

2. Should OPM's Oversight of the FAA be considered Unconstitutional since the FAA has a History of Retaliating against Whistleblowers?

3. If the DOJ said Ash v DOT and Ash v OPM are Similar cases then why was Ash v DOT transferred to the Western District of Oklahoma and Ash v OPM transferred to the District Court of Maryland, and why didn't the DOJ request a Consolidation of Cases IAW FRCP 42?

4. If the Federal Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has Exclusive Jurisdiction of MSPB Final Decisions then why did Defendants request Ash v OPM to be transferred to the District Court of Maryland?

5. If the MSPB said Appellants' claims should be heard by the EEOC on 4/27/21, and the EEOC said Appellants' claims should be heard by the MSPB on 7/20/21, and Ash v DOT was filed in the District Court for the District of Columbia on 9/9/21, then how could the Defendants argue claims were not Exhausted without committing Perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 or Violating Civil RICO under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and (d)?

Should the Title V Exemption extended to the Federal Aviation Administration from the Office of Personnel Management be considered Unconstitutional?