No. 23-7016

Gregory Chatten Stockman v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2024-03-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-interpretation patent-infringement patent-licensing standing state-court-review
Latest Conference: 2024-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the terms and conditions of a patent license agreement are admissible as evidence in a patent infringement case

Docket Entries

2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2023-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Gregory Chatten Stockman
Gregory Chatten Stockman — Petitioner