$ \A)ktf^er DldcJbntd. 1 s (lmj(cUav\ Prmdure h (lA^^dc

($) k)hej&r 0t6.&h?r*&- wakfei ij^cn/>h \qm> )k e
ri'gfd fa dm. pwdt&s z(kuo purwuuA iv HU {ij& Jl^udfw^f
\uit£^i i"&&H fa> d

[ fk Htvo ode- )(~ LUmuJl ^wudurt (M e ex ref /Mtnffi
' r^W^Ve- Lj k> 'fdvb'cwer'J pA-dpn vtiA'an p^eM^ ( uWUc*
wk^t^er Mzm^trmcnj v, fadvA i^M^ 511 Us Mb (-tetC) Ce.4uure s
prouJurtd barriers, fa mdct a Morris dd^/nm
klj] <py-eMi$ed on p^cU^-S m6(AiLB^rvwi ; dv>d
effdiliirtitfs lutisdtdiind thuM, V,
■faJto khem Hit UtuUSbckt 4*4 thto* * f*»*4■e r~s.

Whether Oklahoma's Post-Conviction Procedure Act is adequate