No. 23-6986
Raghvendra Singh v. California
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts constitutional-rights conviction-for-non-crime criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process fabricated-charges false-testimony judicial-misconduct standing
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Q _ftLt-OW TO PROV E THPiT ALLFfipp
CHftRfiES ARE MOT CRWEfiYSFeATTa^c^jo w,^.- ?fi^ES(^TO@)
RUUHS . OTHERWISE. IT ..'■. ■ ■ 1 ■ HFn TSHORiHftPVWfci> tw iwwrACT ^ ^EgS JNJUSTlCE QS IT*^S~~FALSE.
PAGE©)
flUyTIME IN AH
E3ZK^ Sole question
ADDRES^f 1??. RllegH> CHAR& es AR£ MOT eRJMES%
^Wi > I JLJ_XJ
HU6&RK S) V- UWED STA-
C\\m$$ m. HOT CRMFS.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state court erred in not allowing the petitioner to prove that the alleged charges are not crimes
Docket Entries
2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-02-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Raghvendra Singh
Raghvendra Singh — Petitioner