No. 23-6984
Chikezie Ottah v. Verifone System Inc.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 35-usc-101 civil-procedure constitutional-provisions court-jurisdiction judicial-review legal-interpretation patent-eligibility patent-law procedural-rules standing statutory-provisions takings
Latest Conference:
2024-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the question of law presented in the petition for writ of certiorari should be reviewed
Docket Entries
2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent VeriFone Systems, Inc. to respond filed.
2024-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Chikezie Ottah
Chikezie Ottah — Petitioner
VeriFone Systems, Inc.
Carolyn Chang — Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, Respondent