1. Question 1 - Whether the USDC D.E. #51-52, #55 and USDC-COA4th 's Doc. #23
Orders Have Reversible Err and/or Was an Abuse of Power and an Abuse of
Discretion to Not Provide the Appellants With Mediation as Paid or Court-
Appointed Mediation and/or Arbitration

2. Question 2 - Whether the USDC D.E. #51-52 , #55 and USDC-COA4th 's Doc.
#23 Orders Have Reversible Err and/or Was An Abuse Of Power And An Abuse
Of Discretion to Not Provide the Appellants With a Court-Appointed Attorney the
Appellants Requested

3. Question 3 - Whether the USDC D.E. #51-52 and USDC-COA4th 's Doc. #23
Orders Have Reversible Error and/or Was An Abuse Of Power and An Abuse Of
Discretion to Not Provide the Proper FRCP Rule 52 Findings Of Fact and is of
National Importance To Courts And Circuit Court Litigation

4. Question 4 - Whether the USDC D.E. #51 -52 and USDC-CO A4th 's Doc. #23
Orders ' Analysis is Reversible Err and Questionable as Contractual Provisions vs.
Non-contractual and to Determine the Proper SOLand Other Claims (among it to
State Pre-emption, Negligence, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Standard Duty of
Care) and is of National Importance to Court Proceedings and Court Litigation

5. Question 5 - Whether the D.E. #55 Order Is Flawed and Unsupported to Deny the
Appellants ' Rule 59 Motion and is of National Importance to Court Proceedings
and Court Litigation

6. Question 6 - Whether The USDC D.E. #51 -52, #55 and USDC-COA4th 's Doc.
#23 Orders ' Analysis Is Flawed as Dismissal By Various Arguments In It Granting
The Appellees ' MTD Among It The U.S.C. 1983 State-Actors ' Conduct and is of
National Importance to Court Proceedings and Court Litigation

Whether the USDC D.E. #51-52, #55 and USDC-COA4th's Doc. #23 Orders Have Reversible Err and/or Was an Abuse of Power and an Abuse of Discretion