No. 23-6965
Armando Orozco-Barron v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: covid-19-pandemic criminal-procedure dismissal-without-prejudice due-process ends-of-justice individual-assessment judicial-discretion pandemic speedy-trial-act
Key Terms:
ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) May a Chief Judge extend the STA's deadlines by general order, without individually evaluating defendants' interests in a speedy trial?
(2) When an exclusion is entered by general order, may a district court validate that exclusion by retroactively weighing the defendant's speedy trial interests at the motion-to-dismiss hearing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court may extend the Speedy Trial Act's deadlines by general order, without individually evaluating defendants' interests in a speedy trial
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 11, 2024)
Attorneys
Armando Orozco-Barron
Katie Hurrelbrink — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent