Does the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution Protect the Rights of each Justice of the United States Supreme Court, to receive any Petition to the Court, after it was properly mailed into a prison's internal mail system,[S.Ct.R. 29.2], as well as the Petitioner's?

OR

Does the State have the sovereign right to regulate what mail or pleadings it allows sent, and to destroy anything which could reasonably harm the State; Judicially and financially?

Does the Public have a First Amendment Right to Know;of this??

1) Where.Petitioner was acquitted of Arson at Trial; the State in Post-Conviction proceedings knowingly waived Petitioner's Double Jeopardy Claim on remaining counts, per MT.R.Civ.P. 12(b),(h); requiring relief under waiver and party presentation caselaw, with the State Court therefore lacking jurisdiction upon waiver; and on appeal,the then (D) State Attorney General waived under MT.R.App.P. 12(2), that the State was NOT "dissatisfied" with Petitioners New Actual Innocence Forensic (DNA) Science Findings and Jurisprudence; waiving (3) Prosecutorial Misconduct Claims, as 'Fraud upon the Court'related to Lack of Probable Cause, Perjury, and unlawful attack on Eye-Witness Credibility, that a detective was the perpetrator, in §1; and continued 'Fraud on the Court' in §11, with a 'Bounty' on Petitioner.

2) Where the present ((R) State Attorney General refuses to honor the prior (D) waiver, nor apply remedy or relief, required under MT.R*Prof.Conduct 3.4 and 3.8; nor abide by the MT.R.Evid. 402 and 901, nor the above Rules of Procedure; but instead gave an official written directive to State Prison Warden to destroy all evidence of State wrongdoing, including this Certiorari, from prison internal mail:, and,the related §1983/ civil R..T.C..0. suit, casefiles, documenting 'Fraud., upon, the Court', violating the Petitioners 1st Amendment Rights, and also the 1st Amendment Rights of this Court's Justices, as joint victims of Federal Crimes; done to suppress the waived collusion between a County Detective,, ihiring Mexican Cartel Members, who, admit to Torturing and Raping Petitioner to extort a signature on a release of liability form, for,:an Oregon Company caught in 'Bond Fraud' by Petitioner, and who paid 'Bounty' monies to halt,^that ^Bbhd Fraud' suit; with the attached overwhelming conclusive evidence and Cartel admissions of State corruption and Conspiracy violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, Federal Trade Commission Act, the Hobbs Act, and R.I.C.O. Act by Government officials who weaponized the State and Federal Judiciary, defiling the Court's integrity, based on political ideology.

3) Where the U.S. District Court in the related §1983 suit, excused the (R) State Attorney General from a 'Third Party Complaint', to escape 'Third Party Interference by bias interpretation of Law, and 'Abuse of discretion' after Default was filed, is the (R) Attorney General immune from accountability?

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims