No. 23-6952
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-law crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-law hearsay out-of-court-statements sixth-amendment witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE STATE COURT VIOLATED THE MANDATE OF CRAWFORD AND PROGENY BY INTRODUCING A NON TESTIFYING WITNESS'S OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state court violated the mandate of Crawford and progeny by introducing a nontestifying witness's out-of-court statements?
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2024-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Florida
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Frantz Brifil
Frantz Brifil — Petitioner