1.) Whether Congress intended the Alternative sex trafficking of, children "OR®' by force, fraud, or coercion as Alternative Elements or Alternative Means?

2.) Whether Congress intended the 18 U.S.C. § 1591 statue to be used as a "Catch-AlljdSfet" for an Accuse to be prosecuted for violating the 18 U.S.C. § 1591 statue, Whether the alleged victim be)Minor(s) or an Adult(s)? If so, does the statue 1591 controdict definition and/or recognition of establishment of an minor not being an full legal adult to make free will decision, and under-' mines an adult ability to do the same for its actions?

3.) Whether the 18 U.S.C. § 1591 statue have multiple statues combined in one statue that controdicts its' statue to be a single offense. If not, what essential element identifies the distintion of van minor vs. an adult whom choose to independently enter-off-into prostitution?its

4.) Whether Congress clearly discribed the essential elements of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, or is the statue unconstitutional vague and over-broad. What is the true meaning of statue 18 U.S.C. § 1591?

Whether Congress intended the Alternative sex trafficking of children 'OR' by force, fraud, or coercion as Alternative Elements or Alternative Means?