HOW ARE PETITIONERS' CLAIM OUTSIDE "THE CORE OF HABEAS CORPUS", WHEN IT CHALLENGES THE INVALIDITY OF CONFINEMENT OR PARTICULARS AFFECTING DURATION WHICH ARE THE PROVINCE OF HABEAS CORPUS?

WAS THE LOWER COURTS DECISION DENYING PETITIONERS' CLAIM OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS NOT VIOLATED? AND CORRECT OF ITS PROCEDURAL RULING?

Is the petitioner's claim outside the core of habeas corpus when it challenges the invalidity of confinement or particulars affecting duration which are the province of habeas corpus?